<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Don’t Scalpel the Mona Lisa!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://rdrussell.com/dont-scalpel-the-mona-lisa/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://rdrussell.com/dont-scalpel-the-mona-lisa</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 04 May 2015 01:58:27 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=4.2.38</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://rdrussell.com/dont-scalpel-the-mona-lisa#comment-34</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Dec 2006 10:22:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rdrussell.wordpress.com/2006/12/15/dont-scalpel-the-mona-lisa/#comment-34</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#039;m having a guess that this text refers to the organ chorale prelude &quot;Vater Unser Im Himmelreich&quot;, and while I almost agree with the Mona Lisa reference, I think the reviewer has misunderstood the author&#039;s intentions.  The prelude is an extraordinary work in Bach&#039;s output, organ or otherwise, and I believe that is the reason why these devices have been pointed out.  Taking scalpels to things can reduce them only to constituent parts, but doesn&#039;t a better understanding of inner workings in the context of the whole aid appreciation and awareness (and put this composer in his rightful place)?&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;A great site by the way - one of my favourites!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I’m having a guess that this text refers to the organ chorale prelude “Vater Unser Im Himmelreich”, and while I almost agree with the Mona Lisa reference, I think the reviewer has misunderstood the author’s intentions.  The prelude is an extraordinary work in Bach’s output, organ or otherwise, and I believe that is the reason why these devices have been pointed out.  Taking scalpels to things can reduce them only to constituent parts, but doesn’t a better understanding of inner workings in the context of the whole aid appreciation and awareness (and put this composer in his rightful place)?</p>
<p>A great site by the way — one of my favourites!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
