<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Music Business Continues to Pass</title>
	<atom:link href="http://rdrussell.com/the-music-business-continues-to-pass/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://rdrussell.com/the-music-business-continues-to-pass</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 04 May 2015 01:58:27 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=4.2.38</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Richard Russell</title>
		<link>http://rdrussell.com/the-music-business-continues-to-pass#comment-55</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Richard Russell]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 Apr 2011 15:39:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rdrussell.wordpress.com/2007/10/07/the-music-business-continues-to-pass/#comment-55</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thanks for the update/correction! In fact, I do rather remember reading about the instance of the Smashing Pumpkins many a year ago. 

I suppose the point is that the channels of distribution are now more open than ever before. Art is created all the time by hundreds of thousands of artists--that&#039;s a given. But it is just as important to consider how this art reaches an audience of any size. 

For better and for worse, art&#039;s delivery to the public at large is now in the hands of the artist. The implications of this are staggering--not the least of which is how does an individual artist gain attention these days? But also: how is the good separated from the bad? &quot;Great&quot; art is not always recognized, and &quot;poor&quot; art is frequently rewarded for the wrong reasons. 

But the answers to these questions, for now, are less and less in the hands of corporate profit-makers. ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the update/correction! In fact, I do rather remember reading about the instance of the Smashing Pumpkins many a year ago. </p>
<p>I suppose the point is that the channels of distribution are now more open than ever before. Art is created all the time by hundreds of thousands of artists–that’s a given. But it is just as important to consider how this art reaches an audience of any size. </p>
<p>For better and for worse, art’s delivery to the public at large is now in the hands of the artist. The implications of this are staggering–not the least of which is how does an individual artist gain attention these days? But also: how is the good separated from the bad? “Great” art is not always recognized, and “poor” art is frequently rewarded for the wrong reasons. </p>
<p>But the answers to these questions, for now, are less and less in the hands of corporate profit-makers. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Grant Valdes</title>
		<link>http://rdrussell.com/the-music-business-continues-to-pass#comment-54</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Grant Valdes]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Mar 2011 23:51:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rdrussell.wordpress.com/2007/10/07/the-music-business-continues-to-pass/#comment-54</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hi.  Great blog.  I wanted to simply address your statement that the In Rainbows release strategy is an &quot;innovation bound for the history books&quot;... it may end up in said books, but Billy Corgan&#039;s Smashing Pumpkins deserve that spot, for their label-defying recording and free release of Machina II in 2001:   http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Machina_II/The_Friends_%26_Enemies_of_Modern_Music

I love Radiohead.  I even went to a wacky college that let me design and teach a course on their music, as an undergrad.  Yet... I listen to little Radiohead these days, while my respect for the writing of Billy Corgan has only grown.  The whys of that are another issue.  ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi.  Great blog.  I wanted to simply address your statement that the In Rainbows release strategy is an “innovation bound for the history books”… it may end up in said books, but Billy Corgan’s Smashing Pumpkins deserve that spot, for their label-defying recording and free release of Machina II in 2001:   <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Machina_II/The_Friends_%26_Enemies_of_Modern_Music" rel="nofollow">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Machina_II/The_Friends_%26_Enemies_of_Modern_Music</a></p>
<p>I love Radiohead.  I even went to a wacky college that let me design and teach a course on their music, as an undergrad.  Yet… I listen to little Radiohead these days, while my respect for the writing of Billy Corgan has only grown.  The whys of that are another issue.  </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
