<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Richard D. Russell &#187; notation</title>
	<atom:link href="http://rdrussell.com/tag/notation/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://rdrussell.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 05 Dec 2016 01:42:20 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=4.2.38</generator>
	<item>
		<title>The CD as music</title>
		<link>http://rdrussell.com/the-cd-as-music</link>
		<comments>http://rdrussell.com/the-cd-as-music#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Mar 2010 20:06:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Richard D. Russell]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Creativity and Composition]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Harbison]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[listen]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New York Times]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[notation]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rdrussell.wordpress.com/?p=232</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>It’s audition time at music conservatories yet again. I thought I would share something that happens with a lot of frequency, and it’s got me thinking. Someone will come around [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="http://rdrussell.com/the-cd-as-music">The CD as music</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="http://rdrussell.com">Richard D. Russell</a>.</p>
]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://rdrussell.com/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2010/03/2008_08_18-compact-disc.jpg"><img src="http://rdrussell.com/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2010/03/2008_08_18-compact-disc-300x225.jpg" alt="" title="2008_08_18 compact disc" width="300" height="225" class="alignright size-medium wp-image-1739" /></a>It’s audition time at music conservatories yet again. I thought I would share something that happens with a lot of frequency, and it’s got me thinking.</p>
<p>Someone will come around and introduce themselves as a composer, and we’ll say, “That’s fine, that’s great, let’s see some scores!” We composers like to share our scores and have a look and see.</p>
<p>A lot more often than you would think, though, the composer in question will offer CDs instead.</p>
<p>This is met with some collective eye-rolling in conservatories. Does this person not know how to produce a score? Does this person even know how to read music? With software nowadays most people can create <em>some</em> kind of music and put it on a CD, but the printed score is still paramount in classical music. In fact, when seeing a new score for the first time, I know of several composers who refuse to even listen to the accompanying CD, as if this is demeaning in some way. The printed score, for these composers, is apparently all that matters.</p>
<p>And yet.</p>
<p>I mentioned in a prior post what John Harbison calls “us notes-and-rhythms composers.” Of course ¬†a philosophical argument can be made that music need not be limited to notes and rhythms. Almost every week the New York Times reviews some manner of concert that involves live electronics in some way: usually a laptop providing playback of samples or processing live sounds.¬†As well, these kinds of performances are not necessarily supposed to sound the same from performance to performance. It just so happens that, as with jazz or popular styles, the ability to read music can be rather incidental to someone’s inherent musicianship.</p>
<p>I’m not sure who is more at a loss here. On the one hand there is the aspiring young composer who might glean more by learning about theory, notation, etc.; on the other hand there is the conservatory that creates a firewall of musical literacy, one that keeps out a genuinely talented composer.</p>
<p>Is there a happy medium between the two?</p>
<p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="http://rdrussell.com/the-cd-as-music">The CD as music</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="http://rdrussell.com">Richard D. Russell</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://rdrussell.com/the-cd-as-music/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Sibelius explains its slurs</title>
		<link>http://rdrussell.com/sibelius-explains-its-slurs</link>
		<comments>http://rdrussell.com/sibelius-explains-its-slurs#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Aug 2009 19:30:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Richard D. Russell]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Creativity and Composition]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Daniel Spreadbury]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Finale]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[notation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sibelius]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rdrussell.wordpress.com/?p=209</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>In the pitched battle between Sibelius and Finale, one constant criticism has been that Sibelius sacrifices control and power¬†in an effort to make matters simple for the end user. Advocates [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="http://rdrussell.com/sibelius-explains-its-slurs">Sibelius explains its slurs</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="http://rdrussell.com">Richard D. Russell</a>.</p>
]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><div id="attachment_1754" style="width: 295px" class="wp-caption alignleft"><a href="http://rdrussell.com/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2009/08/me.jpg"><img src="http://rdrussell.com/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2009/08/me-285x300.jpg" alt="" title="me" width="285" height="300" class="size-medium wp-image-1754" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">Daniel Spreadbury of Sibelius</p></div><br />
In the pitched battle between Sibelius and Finale, one constant criticism has been that Sibelius sacrifices control and power¬†in an effort to make matters simple for the end user. Advocates of Finale always claim a superior ability to fine-tune notation layout.</p>
<p>That this is so — or <em>has</em> been so — is pretty much admitted in a remarkably honest blog posting by Daniel Spreadbury, ¬†who happens to be the Senior Project Manager at Sibelius. As I come to Sibelius from Finale, my own particular complaint has always been about slurs. About slurs Mr. Spreadbury writes:</p>
<blockquote><p>…it turns out that sometimes you simply need the full control afforded by all of the cubic B√©zier‚Äôs control points, so the first thing we set out to do in Sibelius 6 is provide access to all of those control points. Slurs now show six handles, all of which can be manipulated with either the mouse or the keyboard, and numerically using the Properties window. Furthermore, we made it possible to adjust the positions of each of these control points separately for slurs that cross a system or page break.</p></blockquote>
<p>Finale users will recognize what this means — Sibelius now handles slurs much as Finale does.</p>
<p>Mr. Spreadbury addresses other factors in the development of Sibelius 6 as well in his blog post on “The Story Behind Sibelius 6.” For me, Sibelius 6 now represents the ideal balance between simplicity and powerful composition notation. It’s hard to imagine that Finale is capable of doing something that Sibelius can not — and Sibelius handles matters much more intuitively. I highly recommend this software.</p>
<p>It’s interesting, too, that Sibelius is willing to address its software challenges in a public venue such as this. Be sure to read the entire blog entry <a href="http://www.sibeliusblog.com/opinion/the-story-behind-sibelius-6-part-3/">here</a>.</p>
<p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="http://rdrussell.com/sibelius-explains-its-slurs">Sibelius explains its slurs</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="http://rdrussell.com">Richard D. Russell</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://rdrussell.com/sibelius-explains-its-slurs/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Scoring tip for Mac users</title>
		<link>http://rdrussell.com/scoring-tip-for-mac-users</link>
		<comments>http://rdrussell.com/scoring-tip-for-mac-users#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Jun 2009 17:42:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Richard D. Russell]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Creativity and Composition]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Emily Dickinson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mac]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[notation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PC]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rdrussell.wordpress.com/?p=198</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>If you are entering the word “apple”¬†in to your notation program for a song lyric, is it “app-le” or is it “ap-ple?” Instead of going to your dictionary or looking [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="http://rdrussell.com/scoring-tip-for-mac-users">Scoring tip for Mac users</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="http://rdrussell.com">Richard D. Russell</a>.</p>
]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><div id="attachment_1758" style="width: 295px" class="wp-caption aligncenter"><a href="http://rdrussell.com/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2009/06/dictionary1.jpg"><img src="http://rdrussell.com/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2009/06/dictionary1.jpg" alt="" title="dictionary1" width="285" height="273" class="size-full wp-image-1758" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">How to hyphenate apple</p></div>If you are entering the word “apple”¬†in to your notation program for a song lyric, is it “app-le” or is it “ap-ple?” Instead of going to your dictionary or looking it up on the internet, Mac users have an easy way to find out via the dictionary widget that comes with OS X. Just hit F12 and type in the word, and the widget shows the proper hyphenation, as shown in this picture.</p>
<p>I had to do this just today with the word “scholar” for an Emily Dickinson poem. Is it “scho-lar” or “schol-ar?” A quick look at the widget reveals that the second option is correct.</p>
<p>It’s a tiny detail, but those who make money in score copying can distinguish themselves by paying attention to these little extras. It lends your score an extra sheen of professionalism.</p>
<p>PC users, is there a similar option? Let us know in the comments section.</p>
<p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="http://rdrussell.com/scoring-tip-for-mac-users">Scoring tip for Mac users</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="http://rdrussell.com">Richard D. Russell</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://rdrussell.com/scoring-tip-for-mac-users/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Finale 2010, Sibelius 6</title>
		<link>http://rdrussell.com/finale-2010-sibelius-6</link>
		<comments>http://rdrussell.com/finale-2010-sibelius-6#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Jun 2009 16:32:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Richard D. Russell]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Creativity and Composition]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Finale]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Magnetic Layout]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[notation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sibelius]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rdrussell.wordpress.com/2009/06/06/finale-2010-sibelius-6/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>This is sort of an informational post for those who might not be clued in. Both Finale and Sibelius have announced new versions in the last few weeks. I had [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="http://rdrussell.com/finale-2010-sibelius-6">Finale 2010, Sibelius 6</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="http://rdrussell.com">Richard D. Russell</a>.</p>
]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is sort of an informational post for those who might not be clued in. Both Finale and Sibelius have announced new versions in the last few weeks. I had been a Finale user for years and switched to Sibelius sometime a few years ago, with Sibelius 4. One thing that had always frustrated me about Sibelius is its handling of slurs. Much as I loved Sibelius, I had to admit Finale’s handling of slurs was always better and top-notch. This seems to be fixed in Sibelius 6, and the demonstration on Sibelius’s website suggests a similar approach to Finale, with perhaps a few improvements tossed in. The new Sibelius feature called Magnetic Layout looks superb too. I am looking forward to this update!</p>
<p>Learn about Sibelius by <a href="http://www.sibelius.com" target="_blank">clicking here</a> and about Finale by <a href="http://www.finalemusic.com/" target="_blank">clicking here</a>.</p>
<p>What’s <em>your</em> opinion on these notation programs?</p>
<p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="http://rdrussell.com/finale-2010-sibelius-6">Finale 2010, Sibelius 6</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="http://rdrussell.com">Richard D. Russell</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://rdrussell.com/finale-2010-sibelius-6/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
